Multi-centre evaluation of variation in cumulative dose assessment in reirradiation scenarios.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Safe reirradiation relies on assessment of cumulative doses to organs at risk (OARs) across multiple treatments. Different clinical pathways can result in inconsistent estimates. Here, we quantified the consistency of cumulative dose to OARs across multi-centre clinical pathways. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We provided DICOM planning CT, structures and doses for two reirradiation cases: head & neck (HN) and lung. Participants followed their standard pathway to assess the cumulative physical and EQD2 doses (with provided α/ß values), and submitted DVH metrics and a description of their pathways. Participants could also submit physical dose distributions from Course 1 mapped onto the CT of Course 2 using their best available tools. To assess isolated impact of image registrations, a single observer accumulated each submitted spatially mapped physical dose for every participating centre. RESULTS: Cumulative dose assessment was performed by 24 participants. Pathways included rigid (n = 15), or deformable (n = 5) image registration-based 3D dose summation, visual inspection of isodose line contours (n = 1), or summation of dose metrics extracted from each course (n = 3). Largest variations were observed in near-maximum cumulative doses (25.4 - 41.8 Gy for HN, 2.4 - 33.8 Gy for lung OARs), with lower variations in volume/dose metrics to large organs. A standardised process involving spatial mapping of the first course dose to the second course CT followed by summation improved consistency for most near-maximum dose metrics in both cases. CONCLUSION: Large variations highlight the uncertainty in reporting cumulative doses in reirradiation scenarios, with implications for outcome analysis and understanding of published doses. Using a standardised workflow potentially including spatially mapped doses improves consistency in determination of accumulated dose in reirradiation scenarios.

Brachytherapy is an effective and safe salvage option for re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM): A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries from its inception to June 2023, for eligible studies in which patients underwent brachytherapy for rGBM. Outcomes of interest were mOS, mPFS, OS, PFS, and adverse events (AEs). For individual clinical survival outcomes and common AEs, weighted-mean descriptive statistics were calculated as a summary measure using study sample size as the weight. The calculation formula is as follows: weighted-mean = Σwx/Σw (w is the sample size and x is the outcome). RESULTS: This review included 29 studies with a total of 1202 rGBM patients, including 22 retrospective and 7 prospective studies. The results showed that from the time of brachytherapy, the mOS and mPFS were 6.8 to 24.4 months and 3.7 to 11.7 months. The OS of 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and 3 years after brachytherapy were 58.3 % to 85.2 % (weighted-mean 76.2 %), 26 % to 66 % (weighted-mean 41.9 %), 20 % to 37 % (weighted-mean 27.6 %), 11 % to 23 % (weighted-mean 14.8 %), and 8 % to 15 % (weighted-mean 12.1 %), respectively. The PFS of 6 months and 1 year after brachytherapy were 26.7 % to 86 % (weighted-mean 53.4 %) and 14 % to 81 % (weighted-mean 24.1 %). Most patients with rGBM will experience treatment failure again during the follow-up period, mainly local (10.7 % to 79.4 %) or marginal(3.6 % to 22.2 %) recurrence, followed by distant failure (6.7 % to 57.7 %). Although therapeutic AEs had not been uniformly reported, the overall toxicity rate was considered to be low. The common AEs reported included progressive neurologic deterioration, seizures, CSF leak, brain necrosis, hemorrhage, and infection/meningitis, with a weighted-mean incidence of 1.9 %, 2.4 %, 4.1 %, 5.4 %, 2.1 %, and 3.8 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarized above, albeit mostly level III, suggests that brachytherapy has acceptable safety and good post-treatment clinical efficacy for selected patients with rGBM. Well-designed, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled and prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Curative high-dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas: outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent curative reirradiation (reRT), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PT) for unresectable recurrent or second primary head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). METHODS: Ten patients, mostly KPS 90%, were reirradiated (3/10 with IMRT and 7/10 with PT) at a median maximum dose to the CTV of 64.2 Gy from July 2011 to November 2021. Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the sinus (4/10) and the salivary glands (including the parotid and submandibular gland, 3/10). CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was the time between the end of reRT and the date of last news. RESULTS: The median time between the two irradiations was 53.5 months (IQR: 18-84). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12.5-51.8 months), six patients had developed a locoregional recurrence (LR), of which four occurred within the previously irradiated volume. Two and three-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55.6% [95%CI: 31-99.7%], and 41% [18.5-94%] and 66.7% [42-100%] and 44.4% [21.4-92.3%], respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly better in the subgroup of sinus tumors (p = .013) and the subgroup of patients re-irradiated more than two years after the first course of irradiation (p = .01). Seven patients had impairments before the start of reRT, including hearing impairment (3/10) and facial nerve impairment (3/10). The most severe late toxicities were brain necrosis (2/10), osteoradionecrosis (1/10) and vision decreased (1/10). CONCLUSION: Curative reRT for HNACC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of severe toxicity remain high. Improved selection criteria and more carefully defined target volumes may improve outcome in these patients. A further study including larger cohort of patients would be useful to confirm these results.

Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Locally Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Promising Curative Treatment for Both Radiation Therapy: Naïve Cases and Reirradiation Cases.

PURPOSE: It is difficult to effectively cure patients with unresectable locally recurrent colorectal cancers (LRCRCs) using conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy. Furthermore, treatment options vary depending on the patient's history of radiation therapy. Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a potentially curative treatment for these patients. Here, we compare the treatment outcomes of radiation therapy-naïve cases (nRT) and re-irradiation cases (reRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with LRCRC treated with CIRT at QST Hospital between 2003 and 2019 were eligible. CIRT was administered daily 4 d/wk for 16 fractions. The total irradiated dose was set at 73.6 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness-weighted dose [RBE]) for nRT and 70.4 Gy (RBE) for reRT patients. RESULTS: We included 390 nRT cases and 83 reRT cases. The median follow-up period from the initiation of CIRT was 48 (5-208) months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for nRT and reRT were 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and 76% (65%-84%), respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 50% (45%-55%) and 50% (38%-61%), respectively. These rates did not differ significantly (P = .55). The 3-year local control (LC) rates for nRT (73.6 Gy) and reRT (70.4 Gy) cases were 80% (75%-84%) and 80% (68%-88%), respectively. The 5-year LC rates were 72% (67%-78%) and 69% (55%-81%), respectively, without a significant difference (P = .56). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CIRT for LRCRC is a very effective and promising treatment for both nRT and reRT cases.

Outcomes and toxicity in re-irradiation of gynecologic cancer: Systematic review of the Italian association of radiation and clinical oncology (AIRO).

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide a literature review on the efficacy and safety of reirradiation(re-I) of locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed in 4 electronic databases (1993-2020). Random-effects models and a tendency towards high heterogeneity (Cochran Q chi-square test and the I2 statistic) were used. A meta-analysis technique over single and multi-arm studies was performed to determine the pooled acute and late toxicity rate ≥ G3, locoregional control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Out of 178 articles, only 18 articles accounting for 820 patients (pts) met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were evaluable for 522 patients. Subgroup analyses highlighted moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. BT (Brachytherapy) showed a 2y OS of 63% (95% CI, 55 to 71 p = 0,36) and 5y OS of 42% (95% CI, 35 to 50, p = 0,43) with 1y-2y-3y LC of 74 (95% CI, 62 to 75, p = 0.04)49% (95% CI, 40 to 58, p = 0.38) and 48% (95% CI, 39 to 58, p = 0,45) respectively. Chemotherapy does not improve SBRT outcomes: BT showed a G3- G4 toxicities rate was of26% (95% CI: 8-49%); studies on SBRT re-I showed a G3-G4 toxicity around of 20% if combined with CHT, and <10 when alone. CONCLUSION: A large heterogeneity among studies was revealed, but showing promising results in terms of safety and feasibility. BT resulted the best kind of radiation therapy delivery in terms of clinical outcome and comparable to the SBRT technique in terms of toxicities.

Delivery of re-irradiation and complex palliative radiotherapy using proton therapy in pediatric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The intent of this study is to characterize indications for pediatric palliative-intent proton radiation therapy (PIPRT). PROCEDURE: We retrospectively reviewed patients 21 years and younger who received PIPRT. We defined PIPRT as radiotherapy (RT) aimed to improve cancer-related symptoms/provide durable local control in the non-curative setting. Mixed proton/photon plans were included. Adjacent re-irradiation (reRT) was defined as a reRT volume within the incidental dose cloud of a prior RT target, whereas direct reRT was defined as in-field overlap with prior RT target. Acute toxicity during RT until first inspection visit was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The Kaplan-Meier method, measured from last PIPRT fraction, was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent PIPRT between 2014 and 2020. Median age at treatment start was 10 years [2-21]. Median follow-up was 8.2 months [0-48]. Treatment sites included: brain/spine [10], abdomen/pelvis [3], thorax [3], and head/neck [2]. Indications for palliation included: durable tumor control [18], neurologic symptoms [4], pain [3], airway compromise [2], and great vessel compression [1]. Indications for protons included: reRT [15] (three adjacent, 12 direct), craniospinal irradiation [4], reduction of dose to normal tissues [3]. Sixteen experienced grade (G) 1-2 toxicity; two G3. There were no reports of radionecrosis. Median PFS was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-16.3]. Median OS was 8.3 months [95% CI: 5.5-26.3]. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indication for PIPRT was reRT to provide durable tumor control. PIPRT appears to be safe, with no cases of high-grade toxicity.

Re-irradiation in clinical practice: Results of an international patterns of care survey within the framework of the ESTRO-EORTC E2-RADIatE platform.

BACKGROUND: Re-irradiation is an increasingly utilized treatment for recurrent, metastatic or new malignancies after previous radiotherapy. It is unclear how re-irradiation is applied in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the patterns of care of re-irradiation internationally. MATERIAL/METHODS: A cross-sectional survey conducted between March and September 2022. The survey was structured into six sections, each corresponding to a specific anatomical region. Participants were instructed to complete the sections of their clinical expertise. A total of 15 multiple-choice questions were included in each section, addressing various aspects of the re-irradiation process. The online survey targeted radiation and clinical oncologists and was endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). RESULTS: 371 physicians from 55 countries across six continents participated. Participants had a median professional experience of 16 years, and the majority (60%) were affiliated with an academic hospital. The brain region was the most common site for re-irradiation (77%), followed by the pelvis (65%) and head and neck (63%). Prolonging local control was the most common goal (90-96% across anatomical regions). The most common minimum interval between previous radiotherapy and re-irradiation was 6-12 months (45-55%). Persistent grade 3 or greater radiation-induced toxicity (77-80%) was the leading contraindication. Variability in organs at risk dose constraints for re-irradiation was observed. Advanced imaging modalities and conformal radiotherapy techniques were predominantly used. A scarcity of institutional guidelines for re-irradiation was reported (16-19%). Participants from European centers more frequently applied thoracic and abdominal re-irradiation. Indications did not differ between academic and non-academic hospitals. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the heterogeneity in re-irradiation practices across anatomical regions and emphasizes the need for high-quality evidence from prospective studies to guide treatment decisions and derive safe cumulative dose constraints.

Advancements of radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in modern era.

Head and neck cancer is a kind of cancer which can be eradicated from radical radiation therapy. However, with best efforts, nearly 40% patients will experience locoregional recurrence. Locoregional recurrence is the main cause of cancer-related death in head and neck cancers, so local treatments play a key role in improving progression free survival. In the last decades, radiation techniques have been tremendously developed, highly conformal radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy and proton or heavy ion radiation therapy have their unique radiobiological advances. Although reirradiation is widely used in clinical practice, but little is known when comparing the different techniques. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancers including radiation techniques, patient selection, overall clinical benefits, and toxicities.

Definitive carbon ion re-irradiation with pencil beam scanning in the treatment of unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes and safety of carbon ion re-irradiation with pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery technique for previously irradiated and unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Between June 2017 and September 2021, 24 patients of unresectable LRRC with prior pelvic photon radiotherapy who underwent carbon ion re-irradiation at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Carbon ion radiotherapy was delivered by raster scanning with a median relative biological effectiveness-weighted dose of 72 Gy in 20 fractions. Weekly CT reviews were carried out, and offline adaptive replanning was performed whenever required. The median follow-up duration was 23.8 months (range, 6.2-47.1 months). At the last follow-up, two patients had a local disease progression, and 11 patients developed distant metastases. The 1- and 2-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 100 and 93.3%, 70.8 and 45.0% and 86.7 and 81.3%, respectively. There were no Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities observed. Three patients developed Grade 3 late toxicities, one each with gastrointestinal toxicity, skin reaction and pelvic infection. In conclusion, definitive carbon ion re-irradiation with PBS provided superior oncologic results with tolerable toxicities and may be served as a curative treatment strategy in unresectable LRRC.

Stereotactic Body Reirradiation in Gynaecological Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicities from a Single Institution Experience.

AIMS: To report toxicity profile, outcomes and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients' folders were retrospectively extracted, focusing on the primary neoplasm, previous systemic therapies and previous radiotherapy. Concerning SBRT, the total dose (five daily fractions) was delivered with a linear accelerator using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. Acute and late toxicities were assessed by the CTCAE 4.03 scale. QoL was evaluated according to the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS1 (fatigue), CLAS2 (energy level), CLAS3 (daily activities)]. RESULTS: Between December 2005 and August 2021, 23 patients (median age 71 years, range 48-80) with 27 lesions were treated. Most patients had endometrial (34.8%), ovarian (26.1%) and cervical cancer (26.1%) as the primary tumour. The most common SBRT schedules in five fractions were 30 Gy (33.3%), 35 Gy (29.6%) and 40 Gy (29.6%). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 3-128). There were no patients reporting acute or late toxicities higher than grade 2, except for a bone fracture. One- and 2-year local control was 77.9% and 70.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival was 82.6% and 75.1%, respectively. The overall response rate was 96.0%. Regarding QoL, no statistically significant difference was identified between the baseline and follow-up values: the median CLAS1, CLAS2 and CLAS3 scores for each category were 6 (range 4-10) at baseline and 6 (range 3-10) 1 month after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary experience suggests that SBRT retreatment for recurrent gynaecological cancer is a highly feasible and safe treatment with limited side-effects and no short-term QoL impairment.

Proton Beam Therapy in the Reirradiation Setting of Brain and Base of Skull Tumour Recurrences.

The therapeutic management of local tumour recurrence after a first course of radical radiotherapy is always complex. Surgery and reirradiation carry increased morbidity due to radiation-induced tissue changes. Proton beam therapy (PBT) might be advantageous in the reirradiation setting, thanks to its distinct physical characteristics. Here we systematically reviewed the use of PBT in the management of recurrent central nervous system (CNS) and base of skull (BoS) tumours, as published in the literature. The research question was framed following the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) criteria: the population of the study was cancer patients with local disease recurrence in the CNS or BoS; the intervention was radiation treatment with PBT; the outcomes of the study focused on the clinical outcomes of PBT in the reirradiation setting of local tumour recurrences of the CNS or BoS. The identification stage resulted in 222 records in Embase and 79 in Medline as of March 2023. Sixty-eight duplicates were excluded at this stage and 56 were excluded after screening as not relevant, not in English or not full-text articles. Twelve full-text articles were included in the review and are presented according to the site of disease, namely BoS, brain or both brain and BoS. This review showed that reirradiation of brain/BoS tumour recurrences with PBT can provide good local control with acceptable toxicity rates. However, reirradiation of tumour recurrences in the CNS or BoS setting needs to consider several factors that can increase the risk of toxicities. Therefore, patient selection is crucial. Randomised evidence is needed to select the best radiation modality in this group of patients.

The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors.

Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach, part II: radiation technique and fractionations.

INTRODUCTION: Reirradiation (reRT) of local recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck represents a potential curative treatment for patients not candidate to a salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize literature data on modern radiation techniques and fractionations used in this setting of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was conducted on three topics: (1) target volume delineation (2) reRT dose and techniques and (3) ongoing studies. Patients treated with postoperative reRT and palliative intent were not considered for the current analysis. RESULTS: Recommendations on the target volume contouring have been reported. 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic body Radiotherapy Intraoperative Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy and Charged Particles have been analyzed in terms of indication and fractionation in the field of reRT. Ongoing studies on the topic have been reported for IMRT and Charged Particles. Moreover, according to literature data a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to select patients candidate to a curative reRT in daily clinical practice. Two clinical cases were also provided for its application. CONCLUSION: Different radiation techniques and fractionations can be used for a second course of radiotherapy in patients with recurrent/second primary tumor of head and neck region. Tumor characteristics as well as radiobiological considerations should be take into account to define the best reRT approach.

Pattern of care for re-irradiation in locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national survey on behalf of the AIRO gastrointestinal tumors study group.

PURPOSE: Radical resection (R0) represents the best curative treatment for local recurrence (LR) rectal cancer. Re-irradiation (re-RT) can increase the rate of R0 resection. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines on Re-RT for LR rectal cancer. The Italian Association of Radiation and clinical oncology for gastrointestinal tumors (AIRO-GI) study group released a national survey to investigate the current clinical practice of external beam radiation therapy in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In February 2021, the survey was designed and distributed to members of the GI working group. The questionnaire consisted of 40 questions regarding center characteristics, clinical indications, doses, and treatment techniques of re-RT for LR rectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 37 questionnaires were collected. Re-RT was reported as an option for neoadjuvant treatment in resectable and unresectable disease by 55% and 75% of respondents, respectively. Long-course treatment with 30-40 Gy (1.8-2 Gy/die, 1.2 Gy bid) and hypofractionated regimen of 30-35 Gy in 5 fractions were used in most centers. A total dose of 90-100 Gy as EqD2 dose (α/ß = 5 Gy) was delivered by 46% of the respondents considering the previous treatment. Modern conformal techniques and daily image-guided radiation therapy protocols were used in 94% of centers. CONCLUSION: Our survey showed that re-RT treatment is performed with advanced technology that allow a good management of LR rectal cancer. Significant variations were observed in terms of dose and fractionation, highlighting the need for a consensus on a common treatment strategy that could be validated in prospective studies.

Re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive pediatric brain tumors: from radiobiology to clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Neurosurgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy represent the standard of care in most histopathological types of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Even though the successful cure rate is reasonable, some patients may develop recurrence locally or within the neuroaxis. AREA COVERED: The management of these recurrences is not easy; however, significant advances in neurosurgery, radiation techniques, radiobiology, and the introduction of newer biological therapies, have improved the results of their salvage treatment. In many cases, salvage re-irradiation is feasible and has achieved encouraging results. The results of re-irradiation depend upon several factors. These factors include tumor type, extent of the second surgery, tumor volume, location of the recurrence, time that elapses between the initial treatment, the combination with other treatment agents, relapse, and the initial response to radiotherapy. EXPERT OPINION: Reviewing the radiobiological basis and clinical outcome of pediatric brain re-irradiation revealed that re-irradiation is safe, feasible, and indicated for recurrent/progressive different tumor types such as; ependymoma, medulloblastoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and glioblastoma. It is now considered part of the treatment armamentarium for these patients. The challenges and clinical results in treating recurrent pediatric brain tumors were highly documented.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Benefits and Limitations.

Progress in biological cancer characterization, targeted systemic therapies and multimodality treatment strategies have shifted the goals of radiotherapy for spinal metastases from short-term palliation to long-term symptom control and prevention of compilations. This article gives an overview of the spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) methodology and clinical results of SBRT in cancer patients with painful vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression, oligometastatic disease and in a reirradiation situation. Outcomes after dose-intensified SBRT are compared with results of conventional radiotherapy and patient selection criteria will be discussed. Though rates of severe toxicity after spinal SBRT are low, strategies to minimize the risk of vertebral compression fracture, radiation induced myelopathy, plexopathy and myositis are summarized, to optimize the use of SBRT in multidisciplinary management of vertebral metastases.

Concurrent immunotherapy and re-irradiation utilizing stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG) report 7%-20% 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), while re-irradiation demonstrates 28%-39% 6-month PFS. AIMS: We evaluate outcomes of patients treated with ICI and concurrent re-irradiation utilizing stereotactic body radiotherapy/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SBRT) compared to ICI monotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients ≥18-years-old with rHGG (WHO grade III and IV) receiving ICI + SBRT or ICI monotherapy between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019 were included. Adverse events, 6-month PFS and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate PFS and OS. Histogram analyses of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion metrics were performed. Twenty-one patients with rHGG (ICI + SBRT: 16; ICI: 5) were included. The ICI + SBRT and ICI groups received a mean 7.25 and 6.2 ICI cycles, respectively. There were five grade 1, one grade 2 and no grade 3-5 AEs in the ICI + SBRT group, and four grade 1 and no grade 2-5 AEs in the ICI group. Median PFS was 2.85 and 1 month for the ICI + SBRT and ICI groups; median OS was 7 and 6 months among ICI + SBRT and ICI groups, respectively. There were significant differences in pre and posttreatment tumor volume in the cohort (12.35 vs. 20.51; p = .03), but not between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this heavily pretreated cohort, ICI with re-irradiation utilizing SBRT was well tolerated. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate potential therapeutic benefits to re-irradiation with ICI + SBRT in rHGG.

Linac-based stereotactic salvage reirradiation for intraprostatic prostate cancer recurrence: toxicity and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30-47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate Re­I. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0-2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent. RESULTS: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7-50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2­year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2­year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12-39 months. Re­I was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥ G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia). CONCLUSION: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field.

Treatment plan optimisation for reirradiation.

BACKGROUND: The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) project aims to create a clinically viable re-irradiation planning pathway within a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Such a pathway should account for previously delivered dose, voxel-by-voxel, taking fractionation effects, tissue recovery and anatomical changes into account. This work presents the workflow and technical solutions in the STRIDeR pathway. METHODS: The pathway was implemented in RayStation (version 9B DTK) to allow an original dose distribution to be used as background dose to guide optimisation of re-irradiation plans. Organ at risk (OAR) planning objectives in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) were applied cumulatively across the original and re-irradiation treatments, with optimisation of the re-irradiation plan performed voxel-by-voxel in EQD2. Different approaches to image registration were employed to account for anatomical change. Data from 21 patients who received pelvic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) re-irradiation were used to illustrate the use of the STRIDeR workflow. STRIDeR plans were compared to those produced using a standard manual method. RESULTS: The STRIDeR pathway resulted in clinically acceptable plans in 20/21 cases. Compared to plans produced using the laborious manual method, less constraint relaxation was required or higher re-irradiation doses could be prescribed in 3/21. CONCLUSION: The STRIDeR pathway used background dose to guide radiobiologically meaningful, anatomically-appropriate re-irradiation treatment planning within a commercial TPS. This provides a standardised and transparent approach, offering more informed re-irradiation and improved cumulative OAR dose evaluation.